'Governor Conformist Brown' signing into LAW, a bill to dictate by one party, what is to be taught in history. That the Bill was happened to be aimed at homosexuality, a choice of the individual, is simply is a demonstration of the thin, narrow, sharpness of ignorance and re-definition that the "Party of Collectivism" likes to jab into the Republic of the United States.
That this collective-group-minded-absent knowledge [forget wisdom - verbotten] works on plastic bag tax; content of history, searching with sharp diligence for ways to increase fees, taxes, fines; controlling education opportunity and continuation of work in 27 professions by declaring "no fingerprints, criminal record "searches" for non-existent criminal records = no right to work" (Paragraph 144 B&PCode); controlling religion by interfering with "..free exercise thereof.." in education of founding documents without using "Creator" Divine Providence" Nature and nature's God, The Pledge of Allegiance, or any other recognition of "In God We Trust"; and of course there is that deficit in the Budgets of State, County, City, governments...and union usurpation of citizen money as taxes for 'contracts'. ALL ARE UNCONSITUTIONAL!
fROM MR. WEBSTER 1828 - but actually before 1828, when you consider the size and nature of the undertaking and accomplishment the American Dictionary represents --- especially 235 years later!:
DEMOCRACY [Gr. People, and to possess, to govern.] Government by the people; a form of government, in which the supreme power is lodged in the hands of the people collectively, or in which the people exercise the powers of legislation. Such was the government of Athens. Definition 'collectively': "adv. In a mass, or body, in a collected state; in the aggregate; unitedly, in a state of combination; as the citizens of a state collectively considered.".
REPUBLIC:
1. A commonwealth; a state in which the exercise of the sovereign power is lodged in representatives elected by the people. In modern usage, it differs from a democracy or democratic state, in which the people exercise the powers of sovereignty in person. Yet the democracies of Greece are often called republics.2. Common interest; the public. [Not in use.]
#2 is left in because in 1828 and in 1776 with the Constitution Article I:1 definition of "a Congress" [Not the common 'opinion-based' "the Congress"....article use does change meaning..especially then, but even now].
Just for review, because WE have been learning this right along, and more important, because of the "Relate" and "Reflect" of the 4R's of Classical Learning Methods of the Founders:
CONGRESS: 1. A meeting of individuals; an assembly of envoys, commissioners, deputies, &c., particularly a meeting of the representatives of several courts, to concert measures for their common good, or to adjust their mutual concerns.
"Declaration of Constitutional Principle": An unconstitutional statute is not a law, no matter how vigorously it may be enforced. Enforcement does not make what is enforced the law. What is enforced is a regime. In a constitutional republic, the law and the regime should coincide. If they do not, the regime is not law but anti-law.".
Here is the Logic of 'relating': If Congress (Patient Protection and Affordable Act=No Republican Signatures) and State Legislature with history (No Republican Signatures) use exclusively number of votes to determine the passage of LAW; and if this same single-opinion-group-minded-continue to pass a Bill or Law to President or Governor - absent 100% of minority party involvement - then
1) the majority party is changing the government of the United States of America to a "Democracy of the collective" violating Article V because No member of We the People - elected or not - voted to change via constitutional instructions..the change from the promise of Article IV:4 "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican form of government." This majority party is working a 'coup d'etat if allowed to continue passing no common good or adjustment of mutual concerns via the participation of the elected minority representatives of government!
2) Bills and Laws are allowed to pass and exist...totally absent Representation of "We the People" who elected the members of the minority party. All that a Bill or Law requires is the recognition of the minority view by having Two or More Signatures on the bottom line of approval..for the Bill or Law to go forward. Two members, each house, signature! Doesn't that make a huge statement when a Bill or Law has Zero -0- participation from the minority party? It does! And that is why Article I:1 states "a Congress" on purpose and with much decision and debate during the writing.
Please understand...the greater number does win if winning where the only issue. Winning is not the only issue. Not one founder thought they won anything in having slavery remain..in order for The United States to be born..exist! Believe it or not, that does includes many slave owners.
Number is not the decision-point of "common good" or "adjust mutual concerns"; principle is with derivation from "Religion and Integrity" and the application of the Constitution as the point of decision per instructions from Thomas Jefferson's "On every question of construction, carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed." You have to be a Bible reader to recognize "spirit" [as opposed to temporal]; and Mr. Jefferson probably wasn't thinking about obedience to God's Law...especially when learning about "Jefferson's Bible"; but all the living-daily-Integrity of the vast majority of Americans is included in this simple, but terribly hard to obey by the power-force of a non-entity named 'government'...especially if that government is 'allowed the'blank-one-sided free-throw of law by number only' and absent principle the Supreme Law represents.
Government by its nature in all mankind history, not just now, is never accountable - nor obedient to anything except its own existence at whatever cost to the "person" or individual of our polity in the Constitution; -- or the person living in history of Nations from Before The Bible through this day on this Globe. Maybe now, reader, you can understand why Democracy, alone, was extremely disliked by the founders.
What do "We the People - elected or not" do with "Anti-Law"? There are a number of other principles involved; but simply utilizing "Thou shalt not bear false witness (Bills and Laws passed by number without recognizing the role of the Zero to two elected - both houses)" with "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you". Both work, but required the use of our Creator's name: God and His Son Jesus Christ; and you know how terrible that is:-( for government or public-tax money organizations!
Best would be for the minority to stand together and simply state: "The addition of homosexuality or any topic of history determined by this "one-group of persons" in this Legislature is unconstitutional via the 10th Amendment and via the Definition of Bill or Law with Representative Government. The Minority Party did not come to "common good"' and "mutual concerns" were neither identified, nor agreed. It is therefore Null and void from inception because (the Bill or Law) is inconsistent with the Constitution of the United States. Our "Elected We the People" could also perform that service to citizens who support the existence of government and save 1 or 2 Trillion dollars at the same time - declaring "Patient Protection and Affordable Act" Null and Void from Inception because it is also inconsistent with the Constitution of the United States of America.
I know it is hard to have faith in the law and in the "Religion and Integrity" of our founders. They Did Create an Unique in the World of Mankind's History...these two magnificent documents for you -me - "..persons consisting of or having the essential cognitive attributes of a member of the species homo sapiens...". Not Justices-Judges-Attorneys(except as they act in accord with "Religion and Integrity" of this Nation)-courts-or groups of numbers who also happen to be members of what has become "the Socialist Party of Power-Usurpation" working for global control through the UN and enemies of this Nation; a.k.a Soros-Obama-Alinsky(for ethics and tactic enhancement of take-over).
No comments:
Post a Comment