Why the "Referendum to Overturn Statewide Senate Map Certified by the Citizens Redistricting Commission" is so..

important:   First because of all the reasons stated at www.FairDistricts2012.com; and Senator Wyland's warning that if the Socialists - now occupying Sacramento - can gain 3 more seats; "We the People" of California Shall lose any protection from increases in taxes because the margin to 'hold-off' the Socialists continued flagrant, antiConstitution government -- especially against business and person as taxpayer - shall be lost!

Here is another reason:  1) This commission refused to even consider making a software change. Much preferring to stay with THE SAME SOFTWARE UTILIZED BY THE LAST GERRYMANDERED LEGISLATIVE District/precinct lines.   There are at least two other software resources for UNBIASED district line drawing - neither of which were even glanced or thought of as necessary. Texas uses a combination of 2 softwares: Target and Red Apple. Target draws random districts from survey; as often as requested, and can change lines with each request. Lines can also be changed manually or bunched called 'strikes'.  The strikes can be reviewed for up or down approval by TX Senate.  Red Apple keeps bias out by using 5 areas: population, contiguous, 3 other; but Without Ethnicity as unconstitutional. The other Software company is located in West Virginia and has performed redistricting to most of the States in the South.
2)  The First and Most important part of any drawing of lines for Redistricting was to be correct with The Supreme Law of this Land.  Neither the definition of "person" of the Constitution, nor "We the People" address any physical, cultural characteristic's of "person"; but race-culture membership-became the single, guiding purpose of the District Lines. This person made public input - not published - regarding the importance of 1 person:1 vote-District Lines before Federal Election Act.  But most of public input was along ethnic-cultural lines.

The nature of the Commission chosen members by the State Auditor with the goal of 'unbiased' - not politically active - was biased in the statement of formation itself!  How would it be humanly possible to be unbiased regarding the location of district lines? Most informed Americans are informed just because of the political philosophies which impel them to a particular "name" of party.  Uninformed Americans aren't paying attention and wouldn't apply anyway.

PLEASE SEND THE CITIZEN'S REDISTRICTING COMMISSION SENATE MAP  to the California Supreme Court for The Drawing of Districts and their Precincts.

Thank you, A Native Californian from California before Socialism