About applying our Constitution to the Executive Branch's body scans and pat-downs...

The Entire Article Written above; Absolutely Has Nothing To Do With the Reasons Why the offensive use of 'Body Scanning or  touching the body of any person' is unConstitutional. Including  gross negligence, bordering on cruel and inhuman punishment - since no TSA individual can weigh the effect of their behavior on other individuals who may have been sexually used, or have replaced body parts, that the  individual, has or has not, adjusted to emotionally,  a colostomy; or any device body scanned or touched, as ordered by the Executive Branch - HHS's Opinion of safety "for the greater number".

"We the People in order to form a more Perfect Union, establish justice..." do state that Article IV:2,4 citizens privileges and immunities in state and several states & "..Shall guarantee to very State in the Union a Republican Form of Government. .. '; Amendments IV, XIV; with Amendments V, VI violated by their absence: unreasonable search and seizure without probable cause of person, property (the airline ticket the owner cannot use, unless he/she submits to body scan or pat-down), effects; and without the due process protections of XIV, V, VI - because the HSA charge is against the IVth Amendment.

The Administrations dubious, fallacy of "protecting the safety of the greater number" has been, twice, broken-down with lack of success; resulting in the actual 'Greater Number = 99.8% of ordinary persons going about ordinary family and business responsibilities'; with 0.2% stating loud and clear, it we want to blow-innocent people up, we will at any time we chose! Any attempt won't work to stop "lawless, borderless radical Jihad"


PS: The real reason for 'body scans' PAC's with certain well-placed individuals invested $$$$$$$$ in developing this form of mobile scanning to the tune of several million $$$; just so the US Government would purchase.  Another, of a tremendous number of events occurring BEFORE an Act or Bill is initiated, is Minnesota's allowing criminals to the tune of several thousand votes - vote before the law came to the floor - let alone pass - Hopefully, All Citizens of Minnesota shall remember that the loser of that election was seated in Congress -- not the winner -- ostensibly because there wasn't enough money for a recount!!???