governors asking for 'Regulations' from the Socialists who wrote "PPAA"! Reasons do not matter!
To have to talk about "defunding"; or "to waiting for PPAA to make it through the courts"; or to be fearful of money loss to both Medicare- and Caid Because Of the Unlawful Passage of 'PPAA' By Only One Party in Congress: And most egregious of all, the fear of elected representatives, that because Medicare and Social Security established the Federal Government's role in the private lives of citizens via control of income (paychecks, investments, savings) for the first time; i.e: a form of governmental 'democracy-of semi Progressive nature; logically means: " Therefore the federal government can take (literally) any activity and action against the inalienable rights of sovereign individuals, in any manner it chooses, at whatever time, and for whatever reason"; is exactly what the intrinsic usurpation says-everything to do with power and money in the business of "We the People" - nothing to do with the outcomes of the evil, against the Laws of God and of Justice in Law [not man], Both founding documents represent. 'PPAA' is at the Demand-dictate of Only One Man's: -- usurping action against 3 branches of government in 'centralizing power and dollars of other people's money' in the Executive Branch' [this is true of every single cabinet work adding regulation to centralize and usurp, in this man's treasure-trove of regulation by cabinet czar-director]!
"PPAA":
-- declares 'checks and balances' in The Supreme Law of the Land, useless by placing 6% of GNP into 3 cabinets of the Executive Branch (HHS, Treasury, HomelandSecurity); Privacy and Security of Person, Papers, Effects taboo, by placing photo ids of individuals available into the central computer - designed and in troubled, use before the PPAA legislation became law. This so Treasury can be sure of earnings for eligibility sans State; and HS can be sure of the citizen being who he says he is; with all relationships involved in the family - traditional and extended. Plus have better control of the college Loan program, PPAA takes over 100% from private business in America. And don't forget "PPAA's" Section 6201: Provides for finger-printing and criminal record checks for any employee providing direct care to Skilled Nursing Facility patients ---- or the citizen does not work in the field ---Absent are 4th, 5th. 9th or 14th Amendments involved as even a consideration. This a direct contribution of Andy Stern's Union because fingerprint with criminal record searches for professionals, who have never committed or even thought of committing a crime, are Paid for by the non-criminal, without a record to search for - professional. A wonderful, self-sustaining, already established provider of monetary support to Departments and bureau in many states which control who works in what areas of licensing as a professionals, in the USA.
--re-definition of the words: Patient, Protection, Affordable....and for the benefit of Not-participation by Congressmembers-State legislative members-100% of Federal and State Union Members and therefore their Administrators- and the President's czars, 100% of which are paid by "The taxpayer: That's someone who works for the federal government but doesn't have to take the civil service examination. (Ronald Reagan)";
--who are coerced (though this part of unconstitutional "PPAA" is Article III established by US District court); - without choice into becoming part of the statistical analysis by non-practicing MD's and bureaucrats; - yet to be formatted, but announced a few: decrease mammograms, be careful who and how long you provide chemotherapy to....and onward to oblivion via "The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help. (Ronald Reagan)".
Here are "several ways in which statutes or other official acts may be unconstitutional (Constitution Society)":
1) It may be contrary to a right guaranteed under the Constitution.
2) It may not be based on one of the powers delegated to the government under the Constitution.
3) It may violate the provisions for the structures and procedures of government, suchas the delegation of legislative or judicial powers to an executive agency in violation of the separation of powers principle of the Constitution.
4) It may neglect to perform some duty imposed under the Constitution. The Preamble...
8) It may have been intended to be applied selectively, or have come to be applied selectively, in violation of the equal protection provision of the constitution that all laws must be applied uniformly. [This is a very, very popular violation of the Constitution, not only in PPAA; but also in City, county, State, and Federal laws - even private companies like banks usurping your deposit of money into their bank because they can't be sure of who they are doing business with...as if you had control over their problem!]. [See, I can go after something other than this criminal PPAA!]
9) Proper notice of the law or act may not have been given in a way that would allow people subject to it to become aware of it. Though, actually "We the People" were much more aware of this danger...than anyone elected to office from Either Party. It took much too long a time for Party to recognize temporal attacks on Both Founding Documents! Still are those who don't realize. But for those who do, THANK YOU VERY MUCH AND CONTINUE THE WORK!!!! And passing this act after a statement "We have to pass it to know what it contains." And Doing Just That! Does that help explain the 'tiny,tiny brain cell content'!?
10) The aggregate of laws or regulations may become so burdensome that it becomes unreasonable for everyone subject to it to be sufficiently familiar with it to comply with all of it. That states PPAA's problem too politely - or should I say "civilly" But actually only 'Socialism' will do...with the need to reduce the sovereignty of State, County, City, and Individual for the benefit of the United Nations...!
11) It may never have been properly adopted, or due process may not have been practiced. [Practiced!? How about ignored?] Here is where understanding of history of governing, that each one of the founders were fully informed expressed as "complaints against King George" in the Declaration; otherwise known as the Problem of too big government run by a few, ignorant men; worked to be prevented from happening, again, by the founders in Article I:1 'a Congress' and Article I:7(2) "Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate,shall, Before it becomes Law..":
"PPAA" did not have "a Congress"; was not signed by the minority party of 'a Congress' and therefore was Not an Agreed upon Bill. The founders, everyone understands the greater number; but there is a huge dirth of information regarding number v. character or 'justice by law' or morality. There is no number to define these concepts...least of all, the greater number. Republican form of government guaranteed by Article IV:4; is acknowledged by Article I:1 'a Congress': ".. particularly a meeting of the representatives of several courts, to concert measures for their common good, or to adjust their mutual concerns.". A "concert of measures" is absent from "PPAA'. Concert relates to harmony which requires 2 or more signatures from the minority party --- to be defined as "a Congress"! There are no Republican Signatures on "PPAA". "PPAA"may represent a regime. It does not and is not a law. It is Null and Void -- without any court action....It is Null and void by several Articles, Amendments, Principles, and 'ways a bill can be unconstitutional" ....In fact, it actually is a 'Flagship' for everything lawless about the regime called Obama!
12) Information needed to make a proper determination may have been withheld or distorted in a way that is intended to mislead or which has that effect through negligence (lack of proper care and attention. culpable carelessness - Oxford Dic.)..
For the Governors, for Congress, for States, for Individuals -- our Founders have written law to protect US(A). Please listen, respect and choose God and Country over Obama-Alinsky[now in Egypt via our media announcements]-Stern-Soros. God's word and lessons are considerably more important than one man or any small group of men -- especially of the 'color of law' this Obama Administration represents -- without "We the People"!
-- An unconstitutional statue is not a law, no matter how vigorously it may enforced. Enforcement does not make what is enforced the law. What is enforced is a regime*. In a constitutional republic, the law and the regime should coincide. If they do not, the regime is not law but anti-law.
--Any act performed by an agent of government which is unconstitutional is illegal, and while performing that act the person ceases to be an agent of government or to have any official status, regardless of what trappings of office or color of law he may project. It is also almost certainly a deprivation of the civil rights of someone, and therefore also a violation of one or more of the constitutional criminal laws against doing so.
The "Patient Protection and Affordable" is a mis-named, travesty of both the Declaration of Independence and The Constitution of the United States of America. It is unlawful in 100% of its content. It is Null and Void from its Inception. It Is Time to remove the words and this action "I'm from the government and I'm here to help."
*" 3. In grammar, government; that part of syntax or construction, which regulates the dependency of words, and the alterations which one occasions or requires in another in connection with it; the words governed."
In Oxford, Webster, and N. Webster - all a system of government.
No comments:
Post a Comment