Redistricting, AB459, CA Constitution Article II voting...

an attack on our Nation probably missed because never addressed together, occurred with time in between; and ignorance abounds...which helps the Socialists:


1) REDISTRICTING - John Eastman’s Article regarding Challenge status;
today is a decision day with question “Will the 3 Republicans hold-off the liberal, non-partisan commission. Ron Nehring’s article on 75% plurality in new seats for “Democrat (doesn’t exist as a party anymore) It is CA Socialist Party! See # below

PLUS

2) Article II: Voting, Initiative and Referendum, and Recall: Attention to Section 5:(a) “..All voters may vote at a voter-nominated primary election for any candidate for congressional and state elective office without regard to the political party preference disclosed by the candidate or the voter, ... . The candidates who are the top two vote-getters at a voter- nominated primary election for a congressional or state elective office shall, regardless of party preference, compete in the ensuing general election.” ;

PLUS

3) AB459 Electoral college interstate compact changes this existing law: providing “statewide election of a slate of electors to vote in the electoral college for President and Vice President..” with “each political party selects its slate of presidential electors in accordance with statutory procedures that differ by party.
To this: “ratify a specified interstate compact that requires the chief election official of each signatory state to appoint the slate of presidential electors that was nominated in association with the presidential ticket that received the largest popular vote total.

RESULTS IN

1) Violation of Article IV:4 which guarantees a Republican form of Government. Violation of Article V changing the government of this State and nation, by vote default to a Democracy without using this Article. Violation of America which could fall under High Crimes and Misdemeanors; and given the extent of the above - possibly Treason though the war is without guns unless you count the death of life, liberty as the same effect as guns.  Violation of Amendments IX, XIV.

Mr. Webster on Crime: “ 1. An act which violates a law, divine or human; an act which violates a rule of moral duty; an offense against the laws of right, prescribed by God or man, or against any rule of duty plainly implied in those laws. A crime may consist in omission or neglect, as well as in commission, or positive transgression. The commander of a fortress who suffers the enemy to take possession by neglect, is as really criminal, as one who voluntarily opens the gates without resistance.
But in a more common and restricted sense, a crime denotes an offense, or violation of public law, of a deeper and more atrocious nature; a public wrong; or a violation of the commands of God, and the offenses against the laws made to preserve the public rights; as treason, murder, robbery, theft, arson, &c. The minor wrongs committed against individuals or private rights, are denominated trespasses, and the minor wrongs against public rights are called misdemeanors. Crimes and misdemeanors are punishable by indictment, information or public prosecution; trespasses or private injuries, at the suit of the individuals injured. But in many cases an act is considered both as a public offense and a trespass, and is punishable both by the public and the individual injured.”    Very different from today’s definition in that it includes divine, human, rule of moral duty; against the laws of right, prescribed by God or man...”.

2) A guarantee of socialism of greater number without Noah Webster’s definition of Politics: “ POLITICS, n. The science of government; that part of ethics which consists in the regulation and government of a nation or state, for the preservation of its safety, peace and prosperity; comprehending the defense of its existence and rights against foreign control or conquest, the augmentation of its strength and resources, and the protection of its citizens in their rights, with the preservation and improvement of their morals. Politics, as a science or an art, is a subject of vast extent and importance.”

“Religion and Morality” shall also be replaced by Man’s Laws as expressed in the United Nations charter, WSIS 21/10-12/2006. - a.k.a., Agenda 21, Parental et. al. Sovereignty of State (state isn’t defined) does have lip-service because there is virtually no meaning to the words peace, security, human rights, “worth” part of human person, justice and obligations arising under treaty, social justice(hope fully reader is noticing some literally, red flags soaring in inequity because human kind is the definer of the huge concepts tossed around the UN Preamble.
“Open Society” with Borderless nations and jurisprudence remains the name of law and order from ‘the few human-kind’ without God’s Laws or respect for sovereignty of “person” - one-at-a-time - of our Declaration and Constitution Principles.

3) Socialist Democracy.  N. Webster’s definition of Democracy: “ n. [Gr. People, and to possess, to govern.] Government by the people; a form of government, in which the supreme power is lodged in the hands of the people collectively, or in which the people exercise the powers of legislation. Such was the government of Athens.

Numbers 1 through 3 above are “collective”. It also says “the people exercise the powers of legislation”.  Where are the people of #1 which is controlled by Secretary of State; #2 which is a signatory of certain states yet to be determined ...and absent information with vote of the citizens; and #3 which is absent any “Republic oath of support and defense to the Content of the 7 Articles as “Rule of Law” or “Supreme Law” of this nation.

When you add Mr. Webster’s definition of the “collective” part of Democracy, the meaning becomes clearer still: “1. Formed by gathering; gathered into a mass, sum, or body; congregated, or aggregated.”

4) The UN Charter, Preamble, WSIS are entirely composed of collective, mass, social, environmental and entirety of mankind’s activities on earth defined by the UN; as they are by the Socialist Soros-Obama-Zeitgeist...already in place and working here in our nation:
A. Agenda 21
B. Brown’s Administrative, appointed money-holders declaration of “the people’s privacy” more important than how the same “people’s” earnings as taxes and reported to CACS.
C. The Fact that the Governor (or President) Departments are quasi-government in that regulations can remove from “person” or “person as business” life, liberty, and happiness, based solely on the “right of opinion” of the State or Federally, union member and Trained Inspectors.
D. Unions are also quasi-governments under a closed-shop in that 100% of their funds are taxpayer dollars...without the vote of “We the Constitutional Republic People”.
E. The same ‘Secretary of State managing AB459 is also responsible for absent outcomes of reported voter fraud...both sides of the precinct table 11/2/2010 and previously!  Secretary of State is accountable to no-one, especially law of ethics with Oath of Office.

BUT CAN BE SLOWED AND/OR STOPPED BY THE TOOL of  "RULE OF LAW" - "We the People" using it:  Here's How:
A. Instead of waiting for the Socialist Legislator to write, send to committee to add another chain-link, and to the floors of legislature-2 add 2 more chain-links, and then to governor for the the padlock which seals "anti-law" in place;  WHILE SOME PROPOSED BILLS ARRIVE FIRST - NOT ALL, REGULATIONS, STATUTES, OF ANY KIND GO TO THE APPROPRIATE FLOOR, Return to the Challenge on Constitutional Question: 1)This Bill is a violation of __________part of Articles, Amendments, Sections, Code as Law and Regulation. 2) to the 'Writer of the 'proposed bill', answer Now on this floor in this chamber and in writing as addendum title: "Answer to why the Bill is Not a violation" of Supreme or Any State Constitution (as appropriate). 3) Debate ensues directed to the Bill in relation to the Constitution involved; 4)  Bill found UNCONSTITUTIONAL DUE TO INCONSISTENT, or any of the 12 reasons found in "Declaration of Constitutional Principles" --- Bill is DEAD.

Just look at the money saved comparing the actual events of legislators dictating educational content; combined with the 'going to court' to nullify what is obviously "anti-law";  to when the bill first comes to the Legislators with the power of 'One" as filibuster or "harmony and concert" of "a congress". "You can't have Beethoven's 5th without the drummer" IS THE ESSENCE OF OUR DEMOCRACY IN A REPUBLIC. It recognizes 'EVERY PERSON' as One; it protects God's Laws and "person" which Democracy, alone, cannot...; and it slows, modify's, and stops the 'vagaries of faction' represented by socialism's decline of person, of trust, of life - liberty (lip-service is given); in favor of  "collective", "mass", 'Group-minded' thinking.
The topic could be anything, but homo-sex, a personal choice in a group-setting enforced on the live's of 'person' would be this State's Socialist Legislator's platform...and is reflected in the UN Charter and Principles. The Legislator's choice of topic is also the ATTACK on all Both Declaration (The Premise and The Promise) and Constitution (The Protection of The Premise with The Fulfillment of the Promise*).

EXAMPLE: "homo sexuality taught in school" (there is a reason this was the topic added to edu.* is the Bill.  1) This Bill #__homo sex is Unconstitutional. It is inconsistent with the following principles: contrary  to the right of life and liberty choice of "person", is not based on 'any' power delegated to the government under the Constitution; neglect to perform the duty of "Religion and Integrity" of governance; involves the operation of government outside its constitutional jurisdiction; it is intended to be applied selectively 'history' in public schools - a violation of equal rights (children and young are minors - have no say - and are refused information regarding the "Religion and Ethics" of the Bill's contents). It is a violation of Article I:8, Amendments IX, X, XIV.   2) Now, on this floor and In writing, Mr. Legislator of Socialism, explain why the bill is OK with the Constitution(s) because CA's is a mirror of US. 3) Determine 'Dead' or Debate as needed.

This Must be used for AB459 - Electoral College by State control!!!!!!

1) Support and Defend our Constitution(S) by increasing awareness and challenging.
2) Protect our votes.  No voting, concerned American should be absent from this organization’s goals and work already in progress.

3) Realize that in 'Real Time' "We the People" means We are our Republic. It is correct and right that we say publicly the part and reason the Constitution is violated.

4) Ask all candidates, mosquito abatement to President what they know, not lip-serve, about both Documents.

5) Make sure, especially the younger set with the 'X' & 'Y' generations which were never taught either founding document much less God and Country (unless they are service-members) among your networks or friends, family, associates what the Stakes in 2012 are, and the importance of Each Person's Role to say "ya or Nay".

6) Sincerely Pray for God's Assistance.  "Ask and it shall be opened unto you; seek and ye shall find. Obey God's Laws is all that is asked, though you might smile at this comment :-) [This writer hopes you do!].

*From Joseph Andrew's "Learning and Teaching The Declaration of Independence and The U.S Constitution using Original Texts and the Classical Learning Methods (Research, Relate, Reflect, Record) of the Founders.