Continuing my comment: Because Bylaws of Political Parties have the same purpose.. Continuing my comment: Because Bylaws of Political Parties have the same purpose..

..as "Mission Statements" with "Strategic Planning" in business, I checked out the Democratic and Republican websites for their Bylaws. California's GOP has Section 1.01 states the founding principles in the Constitution and [interestingly] Bill of Rights.  Yep, it's redundant and an apparent requirement to make THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE ABSENT from any "constitutional person"; and therefore reinforce the absence of both Founding Documents with God from our Posterity.  This day, ask the vast majority of OWS age and any person 16 or older, why is mandatory participation in Obama Care wrong?  How many will identify the parts of the Constitution involved - let along how the unconstitutional Obama care is intertwined with Declaration [though very few can answer that of any age!].

 Mission Statements and Bylaws reflect the governing Principles applied to "Religion and Morality" as well as both Declaration and Constitution of George, Tom, Ben, and all other founders.

The Democratic and Republican Parties, do have Bylaws - somewhere in their achieves; but not published anywhere.  I also checked just 2 of the NW - Central States ---- there are no published Bylaws in any of the above locations.  So What?

That means not only are the Axioms of the 1st, 2nd, with complaints to George III, and the closing statements of all signers regarding God and the Natural Rights of all mankind -- not acceptable for law; but also, that there are States which place their "political" actions above the requirements of Principles. [Noah’s 1828 dictionary offers insight which affects the word Politics as history moves forward to the 1913 “update” and the 2011 Merriam Webster Dictionaries in the word “ethics”].

 It could be argued that the States assume compliance with the State's and U.S Constitution; but that is absurd because unconstitutional actions would be prevented rather than ignored. And while, "Robert's Rules of Order prevail --- not if 'contested Republicans are never allowed the floor to speak by use of "compulsion of conscience" and political 'expediency which includes the objects named 'no time' 'not on the floor - in committee' -- rule of order; the use of silence with ignore;  and other such shenanigans.

At the congressional Level, Obama has forbidden and his cohort in unconstitutional activity Reid (goodbye Mrs. San Francisco County - smallest in State and most gerrymander Pelosi) supports - end of "filibuster" a.k.a., an Elected We the People with strong enough righteous feeling to stop procedures on the floor of either House of Congress.   "The Minority of One Protected" removed.
"Silence is Agreement in Law."

In our Constitutional Republic, "Only individual persons or corporate "persons" which are composed of individual persons may be the subject of legal process. INANIMATE OBJECTS and LIVING OBJECTS not capable of conducting their own defense in a court of law MAY NOT BE PARTIES TO AN ACTION AT LAW." .   Inanimate objects include air, water, land, vegetable, mineral with petroleum, nuclear, chemical named carbon dioxide and therefore oxygen. Living inanimate objects include fingers, orifices for obtaining bodily fluids - urine testing, animals as nutrition and food sources.

So you see, This Election IS ABOUT Declaration and Constitution versus conceit, blind, deaf, stiffnecked evil of dictate by few men of "body" absent totally absent "soul" God's  law.