Mr. O'Reilly, you tend to excuse this wrong Administration too much. While you appear to have awareness of the contents of the Constitution, it is very easy to see why you would see no connection between a Progressive - Socialist's word of honor or lack of it and; why the young lady you were talking too correctly continued to disagree with you. Treating the addition of Socialism as just another political activity - although larger than most- goes to the popularity and pressing requirement of this Administration to depend on Party for Politics in "It's ugly! Always has been! Always will be!"(Obama in Bret's interview). The other side is reflected by Tom Delay's answer to Geraldo!

For the record, the Declaration and the Constitution are connected. You cannot have one without the other. "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."(John Adams) "...I am committed against every thing which, in my judgment, may weaken, endanger, or destroy [The Constitution]...and especially against all extension of Executive power; and I am committed against any attempt to rule the free people of this country by the power and the patronage of the Government itself..."(Daniel Webster)

Here is our Nation's Declaration excerpts with the appropriate part of the Constitution are in parenthesis, "...Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed (the Preamble; Article I entirety, Article VI: clauses 2;3),... ...But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism... He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance. For imposing Taxes without our Consent.(Article VI: clause #2;3, Amendments IV and V especially relating to medical insurance corporations* who have been accused of everything including murder without ever receiving an indictment) ... For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury. ....establishing therein an Arbitrary government, (Article V, Amendments IV and V) and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies(Article V): ... altering fundamentally the forms of our Governments(Article V including encroachment between Branches).... We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury... They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity.(Amendment I)

The recurring Myth that only Constitutional Attorneys can argue the Constitution continues wrong. "It is the excellency of this Constitution that it is expressed with brevity, and in the plain common language of mankind.(Oliver Ellsworth, Constitutional delegate 1787)" The Constitution was written for every individual from 7 yrs through adulthood and like the Bible everyone owned, was expected to be read and studied by everyone throughout life. Including as you may be aware, laws for education which include the study of the two Documents including the Federalist Papers. Up until approximately FDR, bills were not considered unless compared to the Constitution (although that sometimes didn't work). And while extremely rare, it is not unknown for one of the Justices to listen and find for one individual because it is the unique, sovereign nature of the individual which gives this Nation its strength. It is interesting to note among the Socialist-Progressive: The only time an individual is recognized is when the individual has enough words to convince a following against the political wind of the Progressive-socialist leadership; and when the individual commits a crime. The Progressive-Socialist Group (Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Stern, Soros) or Group Leader, like the czars or Cabinet members are never, never wrong because "The end Always justifies the means" which is so amply displayed in the passing of all 15 versions (some didn't make it to a number, but were acted upon) of this horrendous health Act which will contribute to the destruction of Capitalism if it makes it to the 5th year.

Only Democratic Party Followers would continue to support an Act that cannot stand the light of day on most of the provisions (I have read 3590). Only the Democrats would pursue small parts of the whole -- without the whole and without any knowledge of what the whole is comprised of. Only uninformed Democrats would buy and pay for a new car that doesn't exist and have no information on the whole parts that make the car run at a cost of $600Billion/Medi -car-e or greater than $40K/family in the Nation's debt! A little like the Progressive-Socialist group, only a Democrat cannot see or understand the Declaration and Constitution, and read the words of our Founders as extraneous, old and not worth their time! Both, Progressives and Democrats, choose to ignore Article VI: 3-their Oath of Office or Article II: clause 8 in original Constitution issue for our President. Mr. Obama as you know graduated from Yale as a Constitutional Attorney. Problem: He studied the Constitution with a Socialist's eyes because that was the single governmental idea he had with his spread-out family.

Both the Declaration and Constitution are written with the King James Version of the Bible as well as Montesque, T. Paine, English Common Law (also from Bible), John Locke, Adam Smith and many others including world history from a closer, nearer viewpoint than Modern hx. Each of the Founders was well informed regarding all decisions they made, as were the colonial Americans. "..And for the support of this Declaration, with firm reliance on the protection of devine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor." - When a Congress-person cannot see or recognize facts which do not support the premise of 100% coverage for all Americans mandatory in 2014; at 6% of GNP (doesn't matter if spread over the 5 yrs) because it is the Money and the Power -of Regulation -of reimbursement -of what quality consists of -of what treatments will be allowed with what diagnoses because of cost by new bureaus and bureaucrats duplicating already working and well used evidence based outcomes with risk management that remains the terrible part of this Act. Reimbursement costs have Never in the History of Medicare/Caid been met at 100% of real money cost plus the annual many government-based accusations of fraud and ....whatever... but Never, Never with the Federal Government taking responsibility for its own contribution to increase of medical care cost. How? When an item, doesn't matter what, which, where, or when, costs $10.00 and is reimbursed to either the private insurance company or the physician or the hospital at $8.00, The remaining $2.00 has to be accounted for in real money -- not government taxpayer resource money. It can sometimes be met with cash from the individual, but for more than the last 20 years is a bartered or contracted amount between every party involved: patient (no say unless a copay), physician, equip. company, insurance, and any other type of equipment like stomach tube feeding. Along with the disparities, is the other never discussed fact that in the same years of the increase in cost, there has been exponential developments in every single area of medicine: labs, xray, scans, medications, treatments, equipment, surgeries, control of complications, transplantations to name a few! Last is the American Insurance plans pie-chart of medical costs with private insurance paying 4% of the pie, hospitals 31%, and physicians 21%, the rest of the pie has other divisions! Naturally, information like this is absent! It doesn't make the end justify the means.

Now you see why we are angry! It Shall Not Leave until the truth is told with the Health Act repealed.

You might be interested to know that this Administrations idea of Progressive - Democracy - Socialist does not believe in a Universal Truth. While Obama does acknowledge God, He isn't considered very reliable or useful in the decisions and judgements about what people need to have in today's world. Relativism is the name of the game for Obama and Company with Saul Alinski, Cloward and Pevin's plans to destroy Capitalism much more useful and used: Fishes in Central CA; how the health-act was put together with Obama's its ugly; how private insurance and medicine is regarded - useless mess. Never said at Obama's level, that medicine on 3/19/10 is the Finest on this Globe and every individual considers it a privilege to have care here.  On 3/20/10, Americans must be pleased to have the intellectual, we shall be vindicated, you have to go down - why not support anyway, the horrendous combination of Executive Branch (no voters or We the people) with H.R 3590 and H.R 4872 no-one but the writers know what the complete triplit bears, but 100% of use with Medicare/caid recipients at the mercy of how these two HR's with Obama's and company judgements.

I am an American Patriot, unemployed, not retired RN without a RN pocket license - not of my choice (another story), who considers learning and teaching the above, mandatory service in this time for our Nation and our Americans who, temporarily went to sleep. We are not and will not be sleeping - now!

Please increase your willingness to understand why a young lady you interviewed would continue to disagree with excusing the Congress-members who also decided to abandon their Oath of Office along with their integrity in signing onto an Act which is aimed at every American regardless of income, in the United States of America sans Obama and Company!

*The actions against the medical insurance companies are probably Article I: 9 - #3 "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed."

Catherine West, San Marcos, CA



PS: Much of what is in the above about the Constitution is also contained in Representative and Senator's State Constitutions. It most definitely is in CA's!