Propositions 20, 22, 27, No on D v. UT 10.27.10, No on K

'False' and misleading mailers: one from Howard Jarvis' Prop. 13 - there are sneakie members, probably at least rhinos, if not worse, in that org.!  And "California Voter Guide" by a 'non partisan candidates selected independent of party affiliation' ----ya, Right!!  

This game playing via candidates, their-possibly good hearted 'junkers of signs', and campaigning off the reason for "Remember in November" which is becoming more and more important with each passing day> because if Repub. Candidates - all levels - don't acknowledge the first 9/12/08 Mall, the second 8/28/10 Mall, and all the election results - including Joe Miller in AK with all that the Left Socialists have performed against California's future in Sac.; then ignoring the root cause will be slower to correct. 

Interestingly, two things: 1)At the last National Ch. meeting, the person or group that presented the 'questions to ask candidates re viewpoint including Declaration & Constitution' to secure the Republican positions with platform, is glaringly REQUIRED with the new CA and probably many other States leaning toward the other word for Disaster: "Democracy" they like to call the US.* That is actually an easy way to raise a Red Flag for any candidate!

2) Many of the Propositions are illustrations of themselves, of the Progressive side (ie #23:don't repeal, just make our exhaled air a little less prohibitive. NEVER MIND and Do Not Discuss the absent quality & ignored facts of the Science of GW):

Proposition 22 and K here in San Marcos:  22 protects Cities and Counties-BUT does NOT change the slush fund called 'Redevelopment' which is invisible to the bond and taxpaying Citizen of CA. Proposition K is a working example of what will occur with the so-called repairing schools - which must be used for this purpose - Bond.  Ya, right again! Because once in the Redevelopment Slush - no one will know for sure.  SideBar:  Another Reason for No on 22 &K - notice the sponsors!  Now tell me where the funds are going!!!!  Bonds are always Loans Against Future Revenue. Haven't we learned enough Yet!!

Another thing, what Kevin, Carl and every attendee at the Monday, July or Aug meeting of SD City Council, Learned:

JUST HOW IMPORTANT AN INDIVIDUAL'S OPINION OF HIS/HER SERVICE FIRST MEANS; WITH HOW EASY IT IS FOR A UNION TO GOVERN IN PLACE OF THE ELECTED INDIVIDUALS. I sat behind the Union Attorney - tall, handsome guy that could hardly leave the room after the vote which would have 'not allowed Proposition D' come to the public because the use of the money was part of the debate.  Someone should get the  video of the entire event --- even the 2nd vote in which Lori Zaphf's opponent changed Back To Conform To the White-knuckled, jaw bitting, attorney for the Unions---who did say in the Monday disallow vote - that Mayor Sanders & Donna's(?) commercial would be the result!!!  All Candidates and Public Servants with the General Public should see these two events.  They Make up the entire, repeating, world of union administration.  Do you see yesterday's UT?  2nd page - Rt. Column: "Reach an agreement with labor unions on a program to allow private companies to bid against city workers for certain services, and ALLOW(!!!!!) THE CITY TO SEEK BIDS. Completed (As a taxpaying, American Citizen; would love to see the Socialist, fraudulent users of money's idea of ALLOW).

To make it shorter, by the time a Constitutional (both) Conservative gets to #4, steam is reallying boiling; but then we arrive at the infamous #8, which 'compromises Peter to Pay Union Paul' all $$$$$$ on the stock market being run by, just the presence, of "America's Financial Stability Act" which all but removes the individual investor from the market---another tragedy of forgotten importance with time; and adds to the risk of any retirement $$$ becoming anything But revenue neutral. Further, creates what could be another slush fund, if the City uses or borrows the money or its interest --- much like Social Security and all with accountability!!  

The Most Important Question of All:   When is Government (City, County, State, Federal) going to begin to recognize that Unions are Fraudulent with Taxpayer Money? That #4, higher hourly pay, greater retirement than some CEO's make, the ability - like Brown's potential: governor, mayor, AG, Gov with all those retirements funds!!!??? 'We ther People' do Not Compromise or report our business to any Union under any circumstance - they are not elected or even approved by taxpayers!! They're force against  any union member; of conformity of union dues determined by union admin. while writing political commercials for their candidates - who are coincidentally of left, bend socialism at this point, is also a misrepresentation of both person and function of the unions? These candidates act as the same lemmings and rubber stamps as does Obama's lemmings: Pelosi, Boxer, Feinstein, Waxler (Van Nuys)-Waters, and other CA Congressmen-ladies.  And Article IV:2,4, Amendment IX, XIV with CA Article I:7(b) which states 'Citizens of US are citizens of state wherein reside and are entitled to all privileges and immunities of every citizen. Union members and admin. have both privileges and immunities - no one else on the Globe, has with retirement guarantees, amounts, stacking, and hourly wages well beyond anything in the private or other American Citizens.  American Working Citizens have no protection against a too large Federal and State Government, City and County which do not practice accountability and all of whom barrow on a regular basis against the 'future proceeds of all taxpayers regardless of level of wealth'!

Taxpayers are compromised through our city, county, state and federal representatives bowing to fraud of union retirement funds, union non-participation in  'PPAA';  and probably a member of the Commission for 'Financial Stability'!

Proposition 20, even 27, is the very Heart of America expressed in Both the Declaration and the Constitution. It is also the very basis ..or the lack of...all the above.  I think some founders reached out from heaven to put their hand on this glorious idea. It is just like them: An idea designed to promote political interests by the left, a form of Democracy, but prevented & limited, by its own rules:  

             The Citizens Redistricting Commission (www.wedrawthelines.com) will eliminate gerrymandering with an attempt to balance opportunities for vote by 'We the People' according to population as even as possible. This by having an open selection process run by State Auditors Department, citizens be the decision-makers with input by state legislators; & when passed Congressional Districts included. It is suppose to be nonpartisan and balanced as possible.

              In February 2010, days after the selection process started and would have 3200 applicants, my self included; the Speaker of the House of Representatives voiced her opposition by placing a re-worded, old redistricting guidelines, continued by legislators, on the ballot.  Stating Nothing will be accomplished by having citizens do what the legislators do!  Such is her continued opinion of the American People, teaparty or not - republican,democrat, libertarian, independent, green, decline to state! Hopefully, Congressional Rule Breaker, disrespectful, ignorant of history Pelosi is looking at her ending days.

Here is the founder's expression of their "glorious idea":  We Draw The Lines and Legislative Drawing of the Lines share a common American Promise: Service with Integrity because Religion and Morality - God and His Lessons of Man in The Bible are the Way, the Truth, and the Light in all things.  Ideas which emit from lessons; and avoidance of "unintended circumstances'" because of avoiding the previous instances in the lessons of history. Both 20 and 27 abound with the resonance of the founders!  Their idea will be lost on the writers of #27 - because it is a reflection of "My seat is Much More Important than My Service To My Country, the Seat Represents".

     But 'We Draw the Lines" has a genuine Opportunity in Proposition 20: This because the 5 Republicans, 5 Democrats, 4 from other smaller, but representative parties are "We the People"; and include the 3 judges from State Auditors Department with input from any Californian interested in following the process.  This is an example of a Functioning Democracy at its Very Best.*  Nonpartisan, probably not; but a much improved chance for success because the Commission candidates do address their own integrity in applying the principles of Redistricting. To make the founder's contrast clear,  Redistricting Commission also represents the underlying problem of Democracy that the founders attempted to warn US(A) about:  Human Nature, special interest, and the 4th Book of "DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA" by Alexis de Tocqueville: "Of certain peculiar and accidental causes which either lead a people to complete centralization of government, or which divert them from it.."  and "What sort of despotism democratic nations have to fear..".  Not may have to fear, but have to fear!  The safety from this fear lies in each, single individual is 100% responsible for his own respect and belief in God; or whatever he defines as being the Truth of his Actions. No one else exists. It is each person's own Service with Integrity.

*Because of 'the misuse of Democracy at the State and Federal level where the Republic of Representative Government is the leader and Republic is badly misunderstood versus the Redistricting which Is An Example of Good Democracy. Maybe it could serve to make the differences more clear?

Is Obama Submissive to Islam? and comment....

"Is Obama Submissive to Islam?" by Carol Taber; from Breibart.tv

Because of the Truth of 'Obama Is Submissive To Islam, the following is also TRUE: 1) Grammar School children in Boston May attend a tour of an Islamic Mosque; but may not pray or recognize the roles of God and our founders in forming The United States of America with all this Nation represents, in its Flag and Pledge of Allegiance, to each student's Birth Right;

2)  This President is following the previous President of the United States in ridding Afghanistan of  'radical Islam (this American Leader, remaining true to Islam and "Newspeak" forbids terms among which is radical)' by American Soldiers fighting, as The Declaration of Independence states "..and to assume among the Powers of the Earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect...". But, as The Commander-in-Chief, will not protect each, individual American Soldier's Right To Vote in the November 2, 2010 election! Meaning allowing late arrivals of  Military Votes which includes DELAYING THE OUTCOMES OF ELECTIONS BY WHATEVER AMOUNT OF TIME REQUIRED TO HAVE EACH, SOLDIER'S VOTE COUNTED! This has not been performed for previous times of engagement; and is a gross act of Discrimination of America's finest, Not Allowed A Voice In Any Election, or because of late, not even given the regard of a count!!  FDR depended on the absence of the military vote to get his SSAct passed among his other insults to America.

This President and his lemming Congress this summer, again prevented Soldier's votes to improve timeliness by stopping the Bill which would have added email and the computer, required for voting in many parts of the States, to be started For This Election, overseas on this Nov. 2, 2010. Stopped for the same reason as FDR; and except for 'Don't Tread On Me' Teapartiers, Constitutional Conservative Republicans in and out of elected office, Republicans and Angry Americans Regardless-Regardless(!) -- of party affiliation; votes to stop Obama and his lemmings this REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER!

3) 'REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER' every incumbent Democrat (D after his/her name) Is A Lemming For This President! In allowing The UnConstitutional*,  100% Americans must join "Patient Protection..."(except Union, Congress, Federal & State Employees or "Protected Class" of Americans); and the "American Stability.." in which Congress is subleasing its responsibilities to another Commission of this President in the Executive, One of the 3 Branches of Federal Government; to continue to enter private business which adds to the already Executive Branch ownership(no thanks to taxpayers): Chrysler Government sans We the People; College Loans sans private Loan Companies, but Utilizing Their Rates of Interest; and yet to be passed: trading carbon dioxide (the air we exhale) chips on the Stock Exchange. REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER, There were NO REPUBLICAN VOTES supporting this President with his 6% takeover of Medical Field; but several Republicans voted for financial stability**.

*Here Americans (18 and up), candidates-working-Naturalized citizens, who know and have learned Both The Declaration's Statements of Principle; and The Constitutions, fulfillment of the Promise of the Declaration; know full-well that learning the Principles and the Fulfillment of the principles in the Protection of the Individual from Government; That Learning of These Two Unique In The World Documents Begins In Grammar School, and continues throughout adult years until unable to speak in each, one American's Voting Voice!
That Obama's concept of providing health is wrong:  Simply Because of Article IV:4 "The United States Shall Guarantee to every State in This Union a Republican Form of Government, and protect each of them against Invasion; ..." plus IV:2 The Citizens of Each State Shall Be Entitled to All Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the Several States." In California's Constitution this same is located in Article I:7(b). Both are repeated in the 14th Amendment.
MOST IMPORTANT PRINCIPLE: BOTH DOCUMENTS ARE WRITTEN FOR EACH CITIZEN.
ATTORNEYS  QUALIFY AS CITIZENS, BUT MAY NOT USE PRECEDENCE FOR PART OF THEIR ARGUMENTS IN OUR CONSTITUTION.  WHEN THE STATES CHALLENGE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR VIOLATING  THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND; DISTRICT COURTS HAVE NO BEARING. THE ARGUMENT MUST GO DIRECTLY TO THE SUPREME COURT.  "..IN THOSE IN WHICH A STATE SHALL BE PARTY.."ARTICLE III:2:2.

**  There is still learning needed for elected and candidates not only for Congress, but also Candidates for Any Elected Position in Government from Local, County, State and Federal levels, and including employees of every Department, Commission, Bureau which write the NON-reviewed Regulations for all laws and government actions at all levels of government.

The Midterm Elections — High Stakes for Health Policy — NEJM

The Midterm Elections — High Stakes for Health Policy — NEJM

The most interesting part of this article: Who cares whether Obama vetos it or not. It will not make it out of the Supreme Court if only because of forcing 100% of Americans and American Business with any relationship to medicine, to join its monsterous duplicating, with about 122 new, union-manned/womanned , ignorant rule makers.

Poems - 'The Gods of the Copybook Headings'

Poems - 'The Gods of the Copybook Headings'

What iambic pentameter! What use of descriptive, meaning-filled words..Wonderful Rudyard...such a joy to read and learn.

Also, what about Fabian Socialism? Who needs the Fabian in front!!? Don't we have adequate with Obamaisms plus Stern's & Unions plus Soros, to = the link that connects the time, sufficient unto their own "definition of Lucifer!?

The Gods of the Copybook Headings

AS I PASS through my incarnations in every age and race, I make my proper prostrations to the Gods of the Market Place. Peering through reverent fingers I watch them flourish and fall, And the Gods of the Copybook Headings, I notice, outlast them all. We were living in trees when they met us. They showed us each in turn That Water would certainly wet us, as Fire would certainly burn: But we found them lacking in Uplift, Vision and Breadth of Mind, So we left them to teach the Gorillas while we followed the March of Mankind. We moved as the Spirit listed. They never altered their pace, Being neither cloud nor wind-borne like the Gods of the Market Place, But they always caught up with our progress, and presently word would come That a tribe had been wiped off its icefield, or the lights had gone out in Rome. With the Hopes that our World is built on they were utterly out of touch, They denied that the Moon was Stilton; they denied she was even Dutch; They denied that Wishes were Horses; they denied that a Pig had Wings; So we worshipped the Gods of the Market Who promised these beautiful things. When the Cambrian measures were forming, They promised perpetual peace. They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease. But when we disarmed They sold us and delivered us bound to our foe, And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: "Stick to the Devil you know." On the first Feminian Sandstones we were promised the Fuller Life (Which started by loving our neighbour and ended by loving his wife) Till our women had no more children and the men lost reason and faith, And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: "The Wages of Sin is Death." In the Carboniferous Epoch we were promised abundance for all, By robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul; But, though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy, And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: "If you don't work you die." Then the Gods of the Market tumbled, and their smooth-tongued wizards withdrew And the hearts of the meanest were humbled and began to believe it was true That All is not Gold that Glitters, and Two and Two make Four And the Gods of the Copybook Headings limped up to explain it once more. As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man There are only four things certain since Social Progress began. That the Dog returns to his Vomit and the Sow returns to her Mire, And the burnt Fool's bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire; And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins, As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn, The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!

Why "YES" on 23...

Why, Yes? Because of the underlying basic lie:  Legislation on imperfect, incomplete, inadequate data to prove the premise - carbon dioxide is increasing to cause global warming-. It is wrong for any government to be involved in prediction of unpredictable data. Remember, government - no matter what form it takes - can only act to: Control by Force, Demand, Rule, Take Money from its citizens; or in the case of the European Union, step on, push-down, or subjugate the sovereignty of its member Nations. Legislation, Laws, Regulations made under the wrongful input of data, of not considering data which must be considered can only result in the crash of the economies.  "But, unfortunately, law by no means confines itself to its proper functions. And when it has exceeded its proper functions, it has not done so merely in some inconsequential and debatable matters. The law has gone further than this; it has acted in direct opposition to its own purpose. The law has been used to destroy its own objective: It has been applied to annihilating the justice that it was supposed to maintain; to limiting and destroying rights which its real purpose was to respect. The law has placed the collective force at the disposal of the unscrupulous who wish, without risk, to exploit the person, liberty, and property of others. It has converted plunder into a right, in order to protect plunder. "And it has converted lawful defense into a crime, in order to punish lawful defense.

How has this perversion of the law been accomplished? And what have been the results?

          The law has been perverted by the influence of two entirely different causes: stupid greed and false philanthropy. Let us speak of the first. ...(Frederic Bastiat; The Law; Google)."   This statement is 100% true for Proposition 32, "No on 23", as well as, Obama's Cap & Trade. False science or as is a better description: "science for the purpose of politicians"-regardless of location on the globe. 

Both the "NO" and the "science for politicians jumbling of facts according to Saul Alinsky: "An organizer working in and for an open society is in an ideological dilemma to begin with, he does not have a fixed truth -- truth to him is relative and changing; everything to him is relative and changing.... To the extent that he is free from the shackles of dogma, he can respond to the realities of the widely different situations...." pp.10-11 of "Handbook for Liberals".  The "Dogma" in this case is 'Scientific Method".

"Yes on 23" because the financial cost; the manipulation of fines setting one industry against another; the attempt to make a gas called CO2, mandatory for life on earth, a subject for government; is the best example of fools and frauds who must act against 'Truth'.