The American's Creed by William T. Page; Clerk of the House; 1917:

"I believe in the United States of America as a government of the people, by the people, for the people; whose just powers are derived from the consent of the governed, a democracy in a Republic, a sovereign Nation of many sovereign States; a perfect union one and inseparable; established upon those principles of freedom, equality, justice, and humanity for which American patriots gave their lives and fortunes. I therefore believe it is my duty to my country to love it, to support its Constitution, to obey its laws, to respect its flag, and to defend it against all enemies.

Saturday, December 31, 2011

You Should Be Ashamed of Yourself...


With “And you call yourself American!” are the newest comments as “compulsion of conscience (N. Webster)” against those of U.S.(A) who stand against whatever the Initiative, Referendum, or Statement of Stand for our Constitution “We the Patriots” take.


These two ‘compulsion of conscience’, with saint-like sideways, hands folded, head-on-chest “body*” position; while “soul*” busily states “How can you do this to___”.  The Event: Stop AB131. The Place: Carlsbad’s Mall.   The unspoken, equally important reason to stop supporting illegals: “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;..”.  Duty and honor require "Religion and Morality" which represent respect for the work of Americans who honor their social contract for the good of the Whole of State and Nation by paying their taxes.  California's 'greater number' has no respect for either the "Rule of Law" or the sovereignty of "person" to be protected under the Republican Representative form of Government.  This 'greater number legislature' declares the Constitutions irrelevant and not to be obeyed demonstrated by the greater number of signed legislation it has passed since at least 11/2010; including AB131 as well as "sexual deviation" important while God Law's and morality forbidden to kindergarten through 14th grade. 


Illegal aliens are “granted” the Privilege of attending College and university using Taxpayer Money. Naturalized and Natural Citizen... do not receive money under the same circumstance because they are Righteous and Legal. The money for the illegals is a Grant from State Government - free give away of person's earnings as taxes - and includes Federal Gov (who could not pass using the nation's taxpayer money) because the money will come from Pell Grants as well as other resources.   


Immunity because while attending college or university, they are exempt from arrest by the Border Patrol.....while illegals otherwise are not exempt from arrest by the Border Patrol. The parents who are illegal arrived in US to have the children who have been here enough years to apply for college, remain here - illegally.  The now,18year-olds, using 'birth certificate' in lieu of citizenship, does not make the children more eligible for privileges and immunities of citizenship, much less access to natural and naturalized citizens who are providing the money the parents are responsible for. Thus a double whammy against the taxpayer: 1) Less money for legal Americans as citizens;  2) fraudulent by government to use tax money for "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.  Redistributing tax-payer money for college or university education for children of their responsible, illegal parents is an illegal act of government placing illegal above citizenship.  


Obama is busily being proud that he has returned more illegals than any other President; but omitting that the increase of illegals results from his inability to secure the borders of the United States of America. This is the other form of “compulsion of conscience” for those of U.S.(A). who place the “Rule of Law” over the Social Justice definition which results from violating the rule of Law.  This is #5: It may involve the operation of government our side its constitutional jurisdiction.”;     And 


#8: “It may have been intended to be applied selectively, or have come to be applied selectively, in violation f the equal protection provision of the Constitution that all laws must be applied uniformly.”, from “..several ways in which statues or other official acts may be unconstitutional..” in “Declaration of Constitutional Principles” by Jon Roland.


The reason 'person' definition is here is to demonstrate how State and Federal government view individuals for the purpose of government's definition of 'protection and safety' or, in the case of children of illegals - for the "Rule of Social Justice" and  because they'll probably vote Socialist(not Democratic, socialist) - since that is what they have been State and Federally indoctrinated disguised as education, to believe. 


PERSON is also: ".. the individual component of the polity.., which is defined as Any Being consisting of or having the essential cognitive attributes of a member of the species Homo Sapiens, including BOTH the capacity to compete with others for the means to exercise the Natural Rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, AND the capacity to regulate its competitive actions TO AVOID DEPRIVING OTHERS of those rights.." from "Declaration of Constitutional Principles".


1828 definition of “Person”: 1. An individual human being consisting of body and soul. We apply the word to living beings only, possessed of a rational nature; the body when dead is not called a person. It is applied alike to a man, woman or child.
A person is a thinking intelligent being.  3. A human being, considered with respect to the living body or corporeal existence only. The form of her person is elegant. 4. A human being, indefinitely; one; a man. Let a person's attainments be never so great, he should remember he is frail and imperfect.”  Thus referencing “body” as separate from “soul” of “thinking, intelligent being.  I know, the man was thinking; the problem is ascertaining the Truth of Knowledge vs. the mythos of social justice through socialism.
"--- 
So go out every day between now and 1/4/12.... to get AB131 onto the Nov. ballot so we can overturn this Socialist government.  'We the People: JUST DO IT!

Gov. Brown with his Socialist legislature got away...

with social plunder because the wrong question was presented to the lemming, socialist-plunder, CA judicial supreme Court of 'We know the verdict before the case is presented-court'.

Here is the correct question:   Should the 'taxpayer's earnings to the State' be allowed to usurp the taxpayer's earnings from the City's voted-by taxpayer's "Planning Departments" ?  Current California State, social plunder, Debt to GDP Ratio is 18.5956%, with $9,849 Total Debt per Citizen (that means taxpayer). The cities of Escondido and San Marcos plus many other of the cities in 58 counties of this State have balanced their elected use of  taxpayer dollars for the city and its future as the Planning Departments.  Shall this State be able to usurp voted, designated in law, taxpayer money to use this taxpayer money in combination to pay its total per citizen debt?  Just to clarify for "person of constitutional, representative, Republican form of government under our Constitution; Total Debt per Citizen = $180,356 + $9,849 = $190,205 and growing per day....

 This concept continues itself at all levels of the socialist redistribution of social plunder spending. On 11/8/11, Escondido was going to be fined $250,000 by the EIP unless it came up with $325,000.00 for the continued investigation by the EIP Contractor into whether our air was legal or putting out contaminates.  Taxpayer earnings providing money for the Appointed underling of the Obama Socialist Government named  EIP to Fine the taxpayer's dollars at the City Government level. Then there is the taxpayer $-EIP, again dictating, forcing and declaring not to coal as electricity in 38% of the States in this Union; while costing the at least 4 mining state's taxpayers the revenue from the coal mining and therefore city and townships of corresponding levels of the Federated form of government.

And, this Patriot's favorite abandonment of Republican Form of government including Natural Rights: Union member dues in a closed-shop government employee system; paying retirement dollars to the excessive (hire new employees or cut number of employees - especially police, fire, teachers) because of the cost of retirement (Oceanside was in the Friday's News) - not because of taxpayer costs to the police, fire or teacher as 'person'....nope! Strictly to fund retirement of existing union members.   Be Clear, the union member isn't the problem --- that's where the abandonment of Natural Right to Life with its Liberty and Pursuit comes-in: Members, also have no choice - they are union, SEIU members - or they are not hired to work in city, county, state, or federal level work; and members have no say on the socialist candidates the political party named union decides to support at the administrative level.dues are paid with taxpayer dollars to the union's Administration and union's administration uses the tax dollars for their political purposes whether membership has a say or not because leadership (the other word for administration) is "authoritarian", straight-line, top to bottom.  

Using taxpayer earnings to redistribute fines, taxes, control with dictate and force - absent the Constitution (either US or State) is the name of the social justice-plunder called "opinion without interference".

?DO WE, AMERICAN'S OF OUR REPUBLIC UNDER GOD, PERFORM: "..But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, IT IS THEIR RIGHT, IT IS THEIR DUTY, TO THROW OFF such government, and to [return to our 235 year history of Republican Representative government under our Constitution and Under God of The Universe], and to provide [respect and recognition for the unique perfection of both our Declaration and Constitution] for their future security. .."?