Out of touch Legislators and changing the 14th Amendment's One Man: One Vote

Re: Steven Greenhut's City Journal article "Inflate the Legislature, a California venture capitalist's plan for reforming an out-of-touch government" (http://www.city-journal.org/2012/cjc1221sg.html ):

If out-of-touch were the sole problem, this might be a good idea; but the problem is "Obama atheist-secular-Sharia- Body/see" court and legislative law with focus of Federal - State-Government Agency's laws disguised as regulation, absent "Religion and Morality" which follows lie upon lie because of Obama-LuciferAlinsky's: ""Radicals must be resilient, adaptable to shifting political circumstances, and sensitive enough to the process of action and reaction to avoid being trapped by their own tactics and forced to travel a road not of their choosing." .."A Marxist begins with his prime truth that all evils are caused by the exploitation of the proletariat by the capitalists. From this he logically proceeds to the revolution to end capitalism, then into the third stage of reorganization into a new social order of the dictatorship of the proletariat, and finally the last stage -- the political paradise of communism." ..."An organizer working in and for an open society is in an ideological dilemma to begin with, he does not have a fixed truth -- truth to him is relative and changing; everything to him is relative and changing.... To the extent that he is free from the shackles of dogma, he can respond to the realities of the widely different situations...." with " Instead the primary assault would be on Biblical absolutes and Christian values, which must be crushed as a social force before the new face of Communism could rise and flourish. Malachi Martin gave us a progress report:
"By 1985, the influence of traditional Christian philosophy in the West was weak and negligible.... Gramsci's master strategy was now feasible. Humanly speaking, it was no longer too tall an order to strip large majorities of men and women in the West of those last vestiges that remained to them of Christianity's transcendent God."  And "The most unethical of all means is the non-use of any means... The standards of judgment must be rooted in the whys and wherefores of life as it is lived, the world as it is, not our wished-for fantasy of the world as it should be...."
"The third rule of ethics of means and ends is that in war the end justifies almost any means...." --which translated into the preferred "modern atheist-secular-UN - Obama - Sharia mantra of absolute-obedience to "Opinion without interference based in Preconceived Conclusions," denying: "and assume among the Powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them..unalienable, Natural Rights" -- otherwise known as the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag -- Republic -- under God - liberty  and Article II and VI;s Oath of Office. Oath:
"A solemn affirmation or declaration, made with an appeal to God for the truth of what is affirmed. The appeal to God in an oath, implies that the person imprecates his vengeance and renounces his favor if the declaration is false, or if the declaration is a promise, the person invokes the vengeance of God if he should fail to fulfill it. A false oath is called perjury."

Obama-Atheist-secular-Sharia-body-see law is not about 'reason for knowledge, wisdom of Truth (Faith) in "The Eternal"; and shall not ever answer to any Axioms of God's Law in Scripture which form the basis of our Article IV:4 The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion... with invasion meaning: " 1. A hostile entrance into the possessions of another; particularly, the entrance of a hostile army into a country for the purpose of conquest or plunder, or the attack of a military force. The north of England and south of Scotland were for centuries subject to invasion, each from the other. The invasion of England by William the Norman, was in 1066.
2. An attack on the RIGHTS OF ANOTHER; INFRINGEMENT OR VIOLATION.".

INVASION,  absent Article V, is the Hall mark of deceit, perversion, and propagation of information censored - removed- and definition of words used in opposite's.

We the People who are honest, God-fearing, lawful in their life, liberty and pursuits of happiness, have never been violated at the God's Laws of the unique, sovereign Soul of Legal, Constitutional Person & have no idea what is happening!

It is time to recognize that the Colonists of 1770, the Founders of both 1776 and 1789, knew exactly and precisely who Obama-Alinsky-Sharia (by name for they knew who "Mohammedans" were (#4 definition of religion at www.1828-dictionary.com); and that the Republic could be lost - Unless: "We have duties, for the discharge of which we are accountable to our Creator and benefactor, which no human power can cancel. What those duties are, is determinable by right reason, which may be, and is called, a Well Informed Conscience. What this conscience dictates as our duty, is so; and that power which assumes a control over it, is an usurper; for no power can be pleaded to justify the control, as any consent in this case is void." (The Essex Result, May 12, 1778)

We the People, especially among the Party of the Teapartier/Conservatives -- absent "the apologist of the Laws of Both Founding Documents and our Lord Jesus/compro-miser named Progressive-group-think-never question or disagree Faction; must return to standing, protecting, and preserving the Republic with the rights of One Person and all minor number persons completely equal to the despotic majority-absent reason.