Sunday, April 14, 2013
April 17 Trial To Determine Fate Of America..Commentary
PRECEDENT is the key word here.
Precedent means that Article III Judiciary never, never has to adjudicate from the words contained in the Laws of Both Founding Documents. Precedent is social justice: "Society can expect the law, which organizes social relationships in terms of rights and obligations, to remain relatively stable and coherent through the use of precedent. The need is great in society to rely on legal rules, even if persons disagree with particular ones. Society, man's laws are supreme over One Person Protected from government / society /man's laws. The Unique Republic of God's Laws of One Person-at-a-time because One Person, alone is accountable to God -- who gave a Person His gift of separate and equal station (Soul) to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them...unalienable rights.
Precedents started in force +/- 1968. Before that, there was enough "religion and morality", to prevent guns, marriage by sex organ as a right, fingers, urine, collective persons, into a courtroom; or legislate plastic bags with God's air the carbon and oxygen-"sustainable" or "Diversity Living" or "Smart Growth" or "Smart Policing" , land, water, minerals. Actually, though sustainable-diversity-smart growth, common core curriculum's indoctrination via revisionist science and history, are all Executive Orders and EPA with Dept. of Edu's Arne Duncan --some of George Soros men's implementation -- the People are not allowed any word about their "life" or their "choices" in liberty.
"Reliance upon PRECEDENT also promotes the expectation that the law is just. The idea that like cases should be treated alike is anchored in the assumption that one person is the legal equal of any other. Thus, persons in similar situations should not be treated differently except for legally relevant and clearly justifiable reasons."
Do you see the problems?
Separate and equal station is One Person the legal, and life, equal of another; but adding the 's' to persons does not equal "corporate persons"; and inanimate and living objects are parties to actions at law. And, the court's devotion to the falsehood of separation of church and state, is demonstrated by God's Laws forbidden in court. Here is the Constitutional Principle violated: "Only individual persons or corporate "Persons" which are composed of individual persons may be the subject of legal process. Inanimate objects and living objects not capable of conducting their own defense in a court of law may not be parties to an action at law.".
Therefore a person does have a body of temporal, society defined, anatomy, physiology, and neurology; but that same Person's Soul does not exist in any part of Article III Judiciary, and Article I Legislative and II as well,so conscience Does Not Exist:
These statements by James Madison are falsehoods, in "Atheist-Secular-Sharia-collective people Law" of courts, and law of legislation in Congress and in, at least one among the several States, the Socialist State of California: " This term in its particular application means "that dominion which one man claims and exercises over the external things of the world, in exclusion of every other individual."
In its larger and juster meaning, it embraces every thing to which a man may attach a value and have a right; and which leaves to every one else the like advantage
In the former sense, a man's land, or merchandize, or money is called his property.
In the latter sense, a man has a property in his opinions and the free communication of them.
He has a property of peculiar value in his religious opinions, and in the profession and practice dictated by them.
He has a property very dear to him in the safety and liberty of his person.
He has an equal property in the free use of his faculties and free choice of the objects on which to employ them.
In a word, as a man is said to have a right to his property, he may be equally said to have a property in his rights.
Where an excess of power prevails, property of no sort is duly respected. No man is safe in his opinions, his person, his faculties, or his possessions.".
In deed, the Supreme Court has found that no Person of Profession has any natural rights in the practice of his profession ; that fingers and urine shall force Person to prove his righteousness, or be assumed a criminal -- for that force is the basis of "diminished expectancy of privacy" for the professional who shall undergoe, the oxymoron, "suspicion-less drug testing"....and many, many other cases; and you have only to look at the egregious, government's -black is white - white is black if it says so, in the words "Patient Protection and Affordable Act (PeePeeAA)".
PRECEDENT "is a more subjective process. Legal rules, embodied in precedents, are generalizations that accentuate the importance of certain facts and discount or ignore others. The application of precedent relies on reasoning by analogy. Analogies can be neither correct nor incorrect but only more or less persuasive. Reasonable persons may come to different yet defensible conclusions about what rule should prevail.
"CERTAIN FACTS". INANIMATE AND LIVING OBJECTS. COLLECTIVE'S COMPRISED OF VIRTUALLY EVERY ASPECT OF LIFE with Justice Stevens, retired, inculcating his 'collective' into ALL his arguments over the years of his work in 'opinion without interference' of our Republic under God, because God's Laws are forbidden. The assumption of good and honest man, is never to be considered. Trust is absent. This is The Greatest Insult to the Nature and nature's God of any Person or corporate Persons' unalienable rights; and destroys "The Declaration of Constitutional Principles"
"The Second Amendment as an Expression of First Principles", Professor Edward J. Erler, writes the 'Perfect Descriptor with contrasts of all that precedent represents in this Anti-Republican Form of government (Justice Stevens, retired), Article IV:4 including protection from invasion: "An attack on the rights of another; infringement or violation". The Sections include "Mired in a Frantic debate"; "The Whole People Are the Militia"; "Arms and Sovereignty"; The Current Legal Debate"; “If Congress won’t act then I will.” Obama. Law "Obama Atheist-Secular-Sharia-collective people designed and defined by government, of, by, and for government.
For this 2009-government's demonstrated and expressed purpose of force, submission, subjugation, and obliteration of One Person's Soul before his God, or 'free agency', choices with their consequences, duties, and morality; as slaves to that despotic, borderless nation and jurisprudence government.
Forget Article V. The overthrow of our Republican Form of Representative government by the Laws of God -- connected through Article II and VI's Oath of Office: One Person's word of Honor to serve in Duty -- calling upon God as a witness to the consequences that person shall sustain should he Fail to uphold his honor. Every official among government, especially Articla III Judicianry who also have to carry the blindfold and balance of indifference.
In short, knowledge for wisdom and justice in Truth....FORBIDDEN
Please realize, the very nature of the person whose name is attached to this case, is unlawful and is the basis of yet another unlawful act against our One Person accountable to God and protected by the Laws of Both Founding Documents.
What's worse is this statement about PRECEDENT: "Precedent also enhances efficiency. Reliance on the accumulation of legal rules helps guide judges in their resolution of legal disputes. If judges had to begin the law anew in each case, they would add more time to the adjudicative process and would duplicate their efforts.
Please note -- that there is no acceptable argument or action against the lawlessness of collective People, inanimate objects, living objects; deciet, lie, and denial of God and Morality, especially as One Person's unique Soul.
Our unique, Republican Form of Government, One Person Protected in his rights from government, has never existed on God's Planet.
We the People must continue to fight and understand that we may need to fight, to preserve The 1620 Puritans brought their Religious Liberty in God for each-one's Soul to Plymouth Rock...renewed throughout our history
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment